Saturday, 21 March 2015

How breeding the best to the best can be worse

by Carol Beuchat PhD





An interesting study was just published about the genetics of behavior in the Belgian Malinois (Cao et al 2014). This is a working breed used in some of the same service environments as the German Shepherd Dog (e.g., military, security, etc), so behavior is important to the breed's function. Malinois that perform well, with good drive and initiative for work, tend to exhibit a circling behavior when in confined spaces, which is a form of obsessive-compulsive behavior. Dogs that do not display the circling behavior, and those that have very high levels of circling behavior, don't perform as well. ....................


Wednesday, 11 March 2015

‘Hunting ban to end this year’


Story Created: Mar 10, 2015 at 8:25 PM ECT

THE country’s wildlife will be back on the menu before Christmas.
In October, the two-year ban on hunting will be lifted, a relief to hunters who were forced to hang up their guns and tie their dogs for that period. 
The announcement was made on the political platform on Monday night by Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar during a meeting at the Kanhai Presbyterian Primary School, Barrackpore.
In 2013, the hunting moratorium was implemented for a period of two years, as a method of preserving wildlife.
Persad-Bissessar said: “In consultation with Minister Ganga Singh (Minister of the Environment and Water Resources), I am happy to announce that it is our intention that hunting will be reintroduced at the end of the moratorium in accordance with the data and findings. All stakeholders will be advised later this year about the reintroduction.”
She said  the survey conducted during the ban was the first of its kind in the country but needed to be done “to collect data that would allow for a better understanding of the state of our wildlife resources.”
Last year September, Singh said Government had no intention to lift the ban “ in the foreseeable future”.
He said a preliminary report of a survey aimed at determining the status of the country’s wildlife population showed an “alarming” lack of wildlife in protected areas and game sanctuaries and it was for that reason the ban was not going to be lifted anytime soon. 
Persad-Bissessar said the survey was “designed to ascertain baseline data on game mammals in Trinidad and Tobago and with subsequent surveys, provide the basis for monitoring trends in population levels through trained community persons and retraining local hunters to collect data on species and their habitat.”
The selected areas that were affected  were Nariva, Trinity Hills, Southern Watershed, Central Range, Northern Range and Main Ridge Tobago. 
Persad-Bissessar said: “The University of the West Indies (UWI) is responsible for the project methodology which was developed to ensure that it is scientifically valid.  The survey focused on the five game mammals. However, all wildlife observed were recorded during the surveys.”
She said 27 groups were consulted inclusive of South East Hunters Association, Mayaro Mafeking Hunters Association, South Eastern Hunters Association, Confederation of Hunters of Trinidad and Tobago and St Patrick Hunters Group.
When the ban was first implemented, many hunters protested against the action. Minister in the  Ministry of Water and the Environment Ramona Ramdial said the main purpose was preservation of the wild animals and the main challenge would have been illegal hunting. The last time a two year moratorium was implemented was from 1987-1989 .  
HUNTERS PLEASED
Hunters throughout the country rejoiced on Monday night when Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar announced that the two-year ban on hunting will be lifted in October. 
However, some questions still needed to be answered, said Buddie Miller, spokesperson for the Confederation of Hunters Association for Conservation  of Trinidad and Tobago.
Miller said: “There are still so many gaps that it is difficult to make an informed comment now. There are still so many unanswered questions because what she is saying is in conflict with what the minister (Ganga Singh) has been saying over and over that he is going to extend it for another two years and he is not sure if it will ever be reopened.” 
He added: “There is an election that is going to intervene with any plans or programmes or promises that are out there.”
But he said he felt elated because the ban was “ill-conceived”.
There were 14,000 hunters registered in the country, he said. 
Tahir Ali, public relations officer of the St Patrick’s Hunting Association said: “There were many letters sent to the Prime Minister concerning that and well I hope she understands because it is an election year. There were a lot of stickers and posters saying ‘No hunting, No vote’.  I think that all the hunters are happy now to hear that. I got a lot of calls this morning asking if I heard the news late night.” 
And he said the data collected by the Forestry Division may not be correct.
He said: After the hunting season, you have to return your permits and when you go to the registration office, the Forestry Department you are supposed to fill out a form and give a report as to what was your catch during the hunting season. But if four people go to hunt and they catch one agouti in the hunt, four people will put they caught an agouti. So it comes like if four agouti were caught. And that is that data they work with and they say the hunters are destroying the wildlife.” 
---Sue-Ann Wayow
***********************

Caiere Chase does not own any rights to the above news article.
All rights to this news article belongs to Trinidad Express Newspapers & Sue-Ann Wayow.
This news article is reproduced here for archival purposes only. 


LINK TO SOURCE OF ARTICLE  


CAIERE CHASE Editor's note: All TrinBago hunters beware, Kamla and Ganga playing dead to catch corbeaux alive.

Thursday, 8 January 2015

MINISTER GANGA SINGH'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES




I wish to announce that Cabinet has approved a series of landmark initiatives aimed at protecting the wildlife resources of Trinidad and Tobago. We are confident that we are doing the right things in the interest of the people of Trinidad and Tobago.
The decision to roll out these measures was not just based on a wealth of research which highlight the unfortunate depletion of Trinidad and Tobago’s wildlife resources. Several public consultations were hosted by my Ministry with respect to drafting the National Wildlife Policy over various locations in both Trinidad and Tobago between the period January 28th 2013 and February 13th 2013. The Ministry invited written comments on the policy which were to be submitted by May 31st 2013. Additionally the policy was made available online for review by the public. Various organisations participated in the consultations including the Confederation of Hunters Associations for Conservation on March 27th 2013. As regards the moratorium, the MEWR coordinated appropriate consultation on August 28th 2013 with the stakeholders, namely the Trinidad and Tobago Hunters Association, informing them of the situation and the proposed measures. I recall meetings with Mr. Buddie Miller and members of the executive of the Confederation of Hunters’ Association as well as Mr. Mohan Bholasingh of the South Eastern Hunters Association. So say that there not consulted on these measures is simply not true. As a result of these consultations, we gathered that the overwhelming view was that there should be an intervention and that a moratorium should be put in place.

By way of background of how we arrived at these initiatives, the current Conservation of Wildlife Act which replaced earlier legislation for the protection of “wild bird” and “ground game”, enables the protection and conservation of fauna (mammals, birds and reptiles) through the regulation of hunting by a system of permits, closed seasons and game sanctuaries. The Act prescribes a closed hunting season which outlaws the taking, sale, purchase and possession of wild meat during this season.

As of the 1990 hunting season, State Game Licences (SGLs) issued under the Conservation of Wildlife Act, were amended to include a Mandatory Hunter Return Data Form which must be completed and returned in order for the licensee to be considered for the issue of an SGL in the future. It was intended that analysis of the returned data would provide an indication of the population status of the game species (Mammals, Reptiles, Waterfowl and Cage Birds) populations and the impact of hunting.

SCIENTIFIC DATA/RESEARCH
The data analysis from the Mandatory Hunting Return Data Forms conducted by the University of the West Indies (UWI) and the University of Wisconsin for the 1990 to 1993 hunting seasons revealed that the catch-hunting effort relationships of the agouti, lappe, red brocket deer, quenk and tatoo had a consistent negative relationship, suggesting that the populations of these animals were being over-exploited. Annual take per hunter fell over the four years, suggesting that the populations of these game mammals were declining at about 15% per annum. The University scientists also concluded that such sustained rates of decline would lead to local extinction of these populations within 25 years. Moreover, what is even more alarming is that this rate of overharvest does not include the unreported take by unlicensed subsistence hunters or commercial poachers.

In a subsequent review of the hunter return forms up to 2005, the University researchers in a brief report to the Conservator of Forests, advised that there continued to be a decline in hunter catch per unit effort indicators for the game species. Since this analysis of hunting data to the 2005 hunting season, the Cabinet-appointed Wild Life Conservation Committee (WLCC) commissioned a survey of the Central Range Wildlife Sanctuary in 2007, to assess the status of game species in the Sanctuary. That study was designed by the UWI, and found that the population densities of all five game mammals were between 3 to 10 times lower than other comparable habitats in Latin America. Such a finding is particularly troubling, considering that this area is a Wildlife Sanctuary where hunting is prohibited.

Since the analysis conducted by the University of the West Indies and the University of Wisconsin on 1990 to 1993 hunting data, the Forestry Division has indicated that there has been a steady increase in annual hunting permits sales.

The records of the Forestry Division indicated that during the 2010/2011 period 22,465 State Game Licenses were sold, in 2011/2012 - 18,990 were sold and in 2012/2013- 21,236 were sold. These State Game Licenses permitted the hunting of Agouti, Caged Birds, Deer, Lappe, Alligator/Lizard, Wild Hog (Quenk), Armadillo (Tattoo) and Water Fowl.

DATA FORMS REVIEW
Review of the hunting data forms submitted by hunters has shown that the number of animals being removed through hunting has increased showing that more animals are being removed from an area of a specific size. The number of agouti removed from their habitat amounted during the hunting seasons 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 was 22,441, 18,772 and 23,911 respectively; the number of deer being removed from their habitat for that same periods amounted to 1,939, 2,115 and 2,331 animals respectively. The number of Caged Birds captured for 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 was 358, 97, and 465 respectively; for Lappe 3,796, 2115 and 4250 animals were removed over the same periods; similarly for Wild Hog for those periods 348,162 and 387 were hunted. Hunting of Armadillo (Tattoo) for 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 amounted to 4114, 3971 and 5007 respectively; for Water Fowl 2741, 1525 and 3944 were removed for the periods and for Alligator and Lizards, 5656, 10891 and 19221 were killed for the period 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 respectively.

Some have argued that the large amount of animals being caught shows that there is no negative pressure from hunting. It must be carefully noted however that as the number of hunters, or hunting effort increases in a common resource, the number of animals captured will increase including the immature or juvenile animals in the population. If this is allowed to continue unabated, the wildlife populations can begin to collapse. We have to protect our babies in the wildlife. If this is allowed to continue unabated, the wildlife population will be exterminated.

GOVERNMENT’S INTEGRATED APPROACH
In order to address this alarming situation, which the current best scientific information has indicated could lead to the total loss of our national wildlife resources; there is a critical need to curtail the hunting pressure on game species. It is against this context that the Government has developed an integrated approach to addressing the unsustainable harvesting of wildlife resources.

I am therefore pleased to announce that as part this integrated approach, Cabinet has approved several landmark initiatives aimed at protecting and conserving this nation’s wildlife resources.

MORATORIUM
Firstly, a two year moratorium will be placed on hunting in Trinidad and Tobago with effect from the 2013-2014 hunting season which is scheduled to commence on October 1, 2013. The moratorium will be enforced by the various agencies and the Forestry Division of the Ministry of the Environmental and Water Resources with assistance from the Ministry of National Security. I recall the words of Dame Jane Morris Goodall, a Britis
primatologist and anthropologist, and UN Messenger of Peace who said “If we kill off the wild, then we are killing a part of our souls.”

INCREASE IN FINES
In addition to the two-year moratorium the Office of Attorney General is currently reviewing the penalties and fines in the Conservation of Wildlife Act with a view to amending existing legislation. It is envisioned that these amendments will discourage individuals from contravening wildlife regulations including the two-year moratorium on hunting. This increase in fines is in keeping with the pronouncements made in the 2013/2014 Budget Statement in which it was stated that the Government will be taking a more proactive approach to protect the environment and will implement a number of measures including increased penalties and fines.

The current fines and penalty regime has done little to deter the illegal activities toward our wildlife resource. Some of the fine increases include the following:
- The fine for hunting of any animal in a Game Sanctuary has increased from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 12 months imprisonment;
- The fine for taking a dog into a game Sanctuary for the purpose of hunting has been raised from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 12 months imprisonment;
- The fine for hunting a protected animal without a Special Game License from the Chief Game Warden has been raised from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $50,000 for “each animal”
- The fine for being found on state lands under circumstances of hunting any second schedule animal under the Conservation of Wildlife Act has been raised from $400 or 3 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license as the magistrate sees fit to $50,000 or 12 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license to as the magistrate sees fit;
- The fine for carrying into state lands any gun or weapon or device capable of being used to hunt any second schedule animal under the Conservation of Wildlife Act has been raised from $400 or 3 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license as the magistrate sees fit to $5000 or 6 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license to as the magistrate sees fit
- Hunting in the closed season without a special game license and not under the special conditions to exercise dogs in lands other than Forest Reserves and Game Sanctuaries has been raised from $2000 or 6 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 24 months imprisonment.

BASELINE SURVEY
During the moratorium a critical baseline survey will be conducted to get a scientific appreciation of our existing wildlife and natural resources. It has never been done. This survey is important and the data obtained from it will certainly aid my Ministry and all relevant stakeholders to better develop our nation’s natural resources. I must also mention that the Ministry is working in a collaborative relationship with the Forestry Division, University of the West Indies and Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations to initiate these surveys/monitoring programmes on game species populations and a comprehensive analysis of the mandatory data forms would be undertaken in order to determine the carrying capacity of the nation’s forest to sustain viable game species populations and determine the maximum sustainable yield for these important wildlife resources.

REVIEW OF WILDLIFE POLICY
In addition to these recently approved initiatives that I have outlined, the Ministry is in the process of developing an overarching management tool a National Wildlife Policy which went through the whole process of consultations and is now engaging attention of cabinet.

COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE FARMING
In addition the Ministry, will be collaborating with the Zoological Society of Trinidad and Tobago, the University of the West Indies and the Ministry of Food Production to undertake initiatives to develop model commercial wildlife farms and to provide capacity building support to encourage rural communities to establish wildlife farms in order to ensure that their livelihoods are not negatively impacted during the proposed two-year moratorium on hunting. The possibility of the provision of FINANCIAL support from the Green Fund to establish a wildlife farm is also be explored. We are well aware that even during the hunting season, wild meat is imported albeit illegally from nearby Guyana and Venezuela. A viable commercial wildlife farming initiative will therefore assist in the provision of wild meat products to satisfy the Trinbagonion palate. I am reminded that in the Red Brocket Deer is no longer part of the Tobago environment.

SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACT
Our Government is well aware of the potential socio economic impact of these measures on communities depending upon the hunting season to make a living. However with these new measures, those who previously made a living from killing will now be embraced by the Ministry and will be able to make a living from conserving.

CONCERNS OF HUNTERS
You would recall that I indicated the extent and depth and level of consultation. Whilst I hear the current hunting lobby “No Hunting, No Vote,” I want to indicate that we hear what they are saying but we must do the right thing. We are doing the right thing through the series of measures that I have outlined. Let me assure all citizens that these decisions are in the national interest and will certainly aid in the conservation our wildlife resources for future generations. We are protecting the wildlife for the future. We will not shirk from our responsibility; we will continue to do the right thing.

CONCLUSION
Members of the Media, Ladies and Gentlemen, Trinidad and Tobago has a long tradition of natural resource protection and conservation. In fact, the country established the western hemisphere’s first forest reserve for conservation, with the declaration of the Main Ridge Forest Reserve in 1765. This Government is committed to ensuring that the rich heritage of our natural environment is protected and sustainable used in a manner that will ensure that its integrity is passed on to future generations. One sure way of doing this will be through the implementation of this integrated approach to the management of our country’s most valuable natural resources.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the media, the task of wildlife protection is high on the agenda of the Government and the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources is committed to working with all stakeholders and interested parties to ensure that the measures implemented are in the best interest of the environment and our precious natural heritage…and I mean all stakeholders. In fact, I hope that the Confederation of Hunters and the South Eastern Hunters Association can embrace this new reality and be part of the preservation of the environment; we are willing to work with them. In the words of the Great Mahatma Gandhi, “What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another.”

I thank you
Written by C News                        
                  LINK TO ORIGINAL SOURCE     
                                                                                                              
















































Reprinted here for archival and news purposes only. 
Caiere Chase claims no rights to this story. 

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Hunters' Perspectives on the First Hound Hunt for Wolves


Theodore Roosevelt and General Custer did it. Now, over 100 years later, a handful of Wisconsin hunters can also claim they’ve successfully hunted wolves with dogs.
The controversial hunt — that’s still being challenged in the state’s court system — began on December 2.  Prior to that date, the wolf season was open, but not with the use of hounds.  The hunt ended on December 23 when Zone 3’s (northwest Wisconsin) quota of 71 wolves, of the state’s 251 total, was met.  Wisconsin has an over winter population estimate of 809 to 834 wolves and is the only state to allow the use of dogs when wolf hunting.

The Controversy
But some interest groups, anti-hunters, and even some active hunters, compare it to dog fighting. This is an uninformed opinion. Unlike in the recent Wisconsin hunt, breeds like the wolfhounds used in Roosevelt’s day often killed the wolves themselves.
But two of the hunters in the photo above, Jay and Jake, had a successful and safe hunt with their hounds this winter. These hunters used the same trailing hounds they hunt bears with. “Our biggest concern over having a bad encounter with a wolf isn’t during the December hunting season, it’s during the bear season, especially if we get near a rendezvous site,” said Jay. Rendezvous sites are locations where wolf pups are left for long periods of time while the adults are hunting. These sites are used from mid June until early fall until the pups are strong enough to keep up with the pack. 
“We’re not going to release our dogs on tracks of multiple wolves, we look for one animal. Single wolves aren’t as bold as packs of wolves will be. When we released our dogs, which are basically athletes doing what they’ve been bred to do, we expected them to bay up the wolf just like they do with the bear that doesn’t tree,” Jay continued. Baying up is a term used by hunters when an animal holds its ground as the dogs’ circle it. 
“We used Walker hounds. These aren’t fighting dogs, they’re family raised pets. The smaller dogs in the 40-50 pound range were the ones that caught and bayed up the wolves,” added Jake.  No more than 6 dogs can be used at one time when chasing a bear or a wolf, although these hunters used only 2 or 3.
Follow link below to read entire article.................>>>>>>>>>>>>
 Published: January 29, 2014
Story by: Dave Zeug
On: outdoorlife.com

Monday, 10 November 2014

EMA outpost for illegal quarrying




Environment Management Authority (EMA) chairman Dr Allan Bachan says it will open a post very soon in Valencia to address illegal quarrying. Bachan, addressing a joint select committee in Parliament on Friday, however, admitted he was still waiting for police to be assigned to assist the authority there. 
He told the JSC, which was chaired by Senator Elton Prescott, that the EMA had received approval for the re-assignment of officers to the post, but was still waiting for acting Commissioner Stephen Williams to assign them. The issue of quarrying was also raised at the EMA’s last appearance before the JSC in July. At that session Bachan said the EMA needed 100 more police officers, since most of the work it did was very sensitive and in some instances had led to death threats. 
At Friday’s hearing, Bachan, together with EMA director Phillip Vilain, technical director Hayden Romano and environmental manager David Persad, re-appeared before the JSC to address questions  about its policies and procedures.
He stressed that the issue of illegal quarrying and the protection of natural resources is a major concern for the authority. He said the EMA had been collaborating with other state agencies, including the Energy and Energy Affairs Ministry, to address quarrying and the environmental degradation of the Northern Range. Bachan did not say how many police officers the EMA had asked for.
Contacted by the T&T Guardian, Williams said the EMA had asked for support. “We have given the undertaking that we will provide Special Reserve Police (SRP) to assist with the policing aspect and before the end of the year they will receive some of the officers that they have requested,” Williams said.
Bachan: We have many challenges
The EMA chairman admitted the authority was challenged in many ways to effectively carry out its duties. He said apart from limited manpower, the very legislation it has to operate creates a challenge. In fact, Bachan said, the current legislation is “soft.” “When the EMA Act came into being it was intended to be soft legislation. So it is cheaper to pollute and break the law than to follow good practice. It is one of the issues we have recognised,” Bachan said.
He said the air pollution rules and water pollution rules were being revised to make them more relevant and strong. The EMA, he said, has no laboratory and this, he said, makes it difficult for the authority to address complaints about pollution. Companies seeking licences to pollute have to do their own tests for three years and provide the information to the EMA to be granted a licence to pollute.
“It is unacceptable to say someone is providing data on themselves. It should be the responsibility for us to assess the tests. The legislation has not worked for us to ensure the proper protection of the environment,” Bachan said. Small budgetary allocations, he said, also prevented the EMA from being effective. He said it often had to rent equipment to do tests because the money it was allocated was not enough to buy equipment.
Tourism Minister Gerald Hadeed raised the issue of the five dead sea turtles that were entangled in gill nets this week and asked why the EMA had not stopped the use of such nets, which have been banned around the world. But Dr Amery Browne said in all fairness to the EMA, banning gill nets in T&T must be a government policy decision and cannot be a decision taken by a regulatory authority.
Bachan announced that the EMA intended to establish an office in Tobago to deal with environmental complaints there. He also said it would soon launch an environmental hotline and an environmental channel.
Story by Reshma Ragoonath
Published: Monday, November 10, 2014                                                                                                     Article reproduced from www.guardian.co.tt/

Caiere Chase neither owns nor claims any rights to this news article.
Article reproduced here for archival purposes.