Thursday, 8 January 2015

MINISTER GANGA SINGH'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES




I wish to announce that Cabinet has approved a series of landmark initiatives aimed at protecting the wildlife resources of Trinidad and Tobago. We are confident that we are doing the right things in the interest of the people of Trinidad and Tobago.
The decision to roll out these measures was not just based on a wealth of research which highlight the unfortunate depletion of Trinidad and Tobago’s wildlife resources. Several public consultations were hosted by my Ministry with respect to drafting the National Wildlife Policy over various locations in both Trinidad and Tobago between the period January 28th 2013 and February 13th 2013. The Ministry invited written comments on the policy which were to be submitted by May 31st 2013. Additionally the policy was made available online for review by the public. Various organisations participated in the consultations including the Confederation of Hunters Associations for Conservation on March 27th 2013. As regards the moratorium, the MEWR coordinated appropriate consultation on August 28th 2013 with the stakeholders, namely the Trinidad and Tobago Hunters Association, informing them of the situation and the proposed measures. I recall meetings with Mr. Buddie Miller and members of the executive of the Confederation of Hunters’ Association as well as Mr. Mohan Bholasingh of the South Eastern Hunters Association. So say that there not consulted on these measures is simply not true. As a result of these consultations, we gathered that the overwhelming view was that there should be an intervention and that a moratorium should be put in place.

By way of background of how we arrived at these initiatives, the current Conservation of Wildlife Act which replaced earlier legislation for the protection of “wild bird” and “ground game”, enables the protection and conservation of fauna (mammals, birds and reptiles) through the regulation of hunting by a system of permits, closed seasons and game sanctuaries. The Act prescribes a closed hunting season which outlaws the taking, sale, purchase and possession of wild meat during this season.

As of the 1990 hunting season, State Game Licences (SGLs) issued under the Conservation of Wildlife Act, were amended to include a Mandatory Hunter Return Data Form which must be completed and returned in order for the licensee to be considered for the issue of an SGL in the future. It was intended that analysis of the returned data would provide an indication of the population status of the game species (Mammals, Reptiles, Waterfowl and Cage Birds) populations and the impact of hunting.

SCIENTIFIC DATA/RESEARCH
The data analysis from the Mandatory Hunting Return Data Forms conducted by the University of the West Indies (UWI) and the University of Wisconsin for the 1990 to 1993 hunting seasons revealed that the catch-hunting effort relationships of the agouti, lappe, red brocket deer, quenk and tatoo had a consistent negative relationship, suggesting that the populations of these animals were being over-exploited. Annual take per hunter fell over the four years, suggesting that the populations of these game mammals were declining at about 15% per annum. The University scientists also concluded that such sustained rates of decline would lead to local extinction of these populations within 25 years. Moreover, what is even more alarming is that this rate of overharvest does not include the unreported take by unlicensed subsistence hunters or commercial poachers.

In a subsequent review of the hunter return forms up to 2005, the University researchers in a brief report to the Conservator of Forests, advised that there continued to be a decline in hunter catch per unit effort indicators for the game species. Since this analysis of hunting data to the 2005 hunting season, the Cabinet-appointed Wild Life Conservation Committee (WLCC) commissioned a survey of the Central Range Wildlife Sanctuary in 2007, to assess the status of game species in the Sanctuary. That study was designed by the UWI, and found that the population densities of all five game mammals were between 3 to 10 times lower than other comparable habitats in Latin America. Such a finding is particularly troubling, considering that this area is a Wildlife Sanctuary where hunting is prohibited.

Since the analysis conducted by the University of the West Indies and the University of Wisconsin on 1990 to 1993 hunting data, the Forestry Division has indicated that there has been a steady increase in annual hunting permits sales.

The records of the Forestry Division indicated that during the 2010/2011 period 22,465 State Game Licenses were sold, in 2011/2012 - 18,990 were sold and in 2012/2013- 21,236 were sold. These State Game Licenses permitted the hunting of Agouti, Caged Birds, Deer, Lappe, Alligator/Lizard, Wild Hog (Quenk), Armadillo (Tattoo) and Water Fowl.

DATA FORMS REVIEW
Review of the hunting data forms submitted by hunters has shown that the number of animals being removed through hunting has increased showing that more animals are being removed from an area of a specific size. The number of agouti removed from their habitat amounted during the hunting seasons 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 was 22,441, 18,772 and 23,911 respectively; the number of deer being removed from their habitat for that same periods amounted to 1,939, 2,115 and 2,331 animals respectively. The number of Caged Birds captured for 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 was 358, 97, and 465 respectively; for Lappe 3,796, 2115 and 4250 animals were removed over the same periods; similarly for Wild Hog for those periods 348,162 and 387 were hunted. Hunting of Armadillo (Tattoo) for 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 amounted to 4114, 3971 and 5007 respectively; for Water Fowl 2741, 1525 and 3944 were removed for the periods and for Alligator and Lizards, 5656, 10891 and 19221 were killed for the period 2010/2011, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 respectively.

Some have argued that the large amount of animals being caught shows that there is no negative pressure from hunting. It must be carefully noted however that as the number of hunters, or hunting effort increases in a common resource, the number of animals captured will increase including the immature or juvenile animals in the population. If this is allowed to continue unabated, the wildlife populations can begin to collapse. We have to protect our babies in the wildlife. If this is allowed to continue unabated, the wildlife population will be exterminated.

GOVERNMENT’S INTEGRATED APPROACH
In order to address this alarming situation, which the current best scientific information has indicated could lead to the total loss of our national wildlife resources; there is a critical need to curtail the hunting pressure on game species. It is against this context that the Government has developed an integrated approach to addressing the unsustainable harvesting of wildlife resources.

I am therefore pleased to announce that as part this integrated approach, Cabinet has approved several landmark initiatives aimed at protecting and conserving this nation’s wildlife resources.

MORATORIUM
Firstly, a two year moratorium will be placed on hunting in Trinidad and Tobago with effect from the 2013-2014 hunting season which is scheduled to commence on October 1, 2013. The moratorium will be enforced by the various agencies and the Forestry Division of the Ministry of the Environmental and Water Resources with assistance from the Ministry of National Security. I recall the words of Dame Jane Morris Goodall, a Britis
primatologist and anthropologist, and UN Messenger of Peace who said “If we kill off the wild, then we are killing a part of our souls.”

INCREASE IN FINES
In addition to the two-year moratorium the Office of Attorney General is currently reviewing the penalties and fines in the Conservation of Wildlife Act with a view to amending existing legislation. It is envisioned that these amendments will discourage individuals from contravening wildlife regulations including the two-year moratorium on hunting. This increase in fines is in keeping with the pronouncements made in the 2013/2014 Budget Statement in which it was stated that the Government will be taking a more proactive approach to protect the environment and will implement a number of measures including increased penalties and fines.

The current fines and penalty regime has done little to deter the illegal activities toward our wildlife resource. Some of the fine increases include the following:
- The fine for hunting of any animal in a Game Sanctuary has increased from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 12 months imprisonment;
- The fine for taking a dog into a game Sanctuary for the purpose of hunting has been raised from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 12 months imprisonment;
- The fine for hunting a protected animal without a Special Game License from the Chief Game Warden has been raised from $1000 or 3 months imprisonment to $50,000 for “each animal”
- The fine for being found on state lands under circumstances of hunting any second schedule animal under the Conservation of Wildlife Act has been raised from $400 or 3 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license as the magistrate sees fit to $50,000 or 12 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license to as the magistrate sees fit;
- The fine for carrying into state lands any gun or weapon or device capable of being used to hunt any second schedule animal under the Conservation of Wildlife Act has been raised from $400 or 3 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license as the magistrate sees fit to $5000 or 6 months imprisonment and disqualification from holding a state game license to as the magistrate sees fit
- Hunting in the closed season without a special game license and not under the special conditions to exercise dogs in lands other than Forest Reserves and Game Sanctuaries has been raised from $2000 or 6 months imprisonment to $100,000 or 24 months imprisonment.

BASELINE SURVEY
During the moratorium a critical baseline survey will be conducted to get a scientific appreciation of our existing wildlife and natural resources. It has never been done. This survey is important and the data obtained from it will certainly aid my Ministry and all relevant stakeholders to better develop our nation’s natural resources. I must also mention that the Ministry is working in a collaborative relationship with the Forestry Division, University of the West Indies and Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations to initiate these surveys/monitoring programmes on game species populations and a comprehensive analysis of the mandatory data forms would be undertaken in order to determine the carrying capacity of the nation’s forest to sustain viable game species populations and determine the maximum sustainable yield for these important wildlife resources.

REVIEW OF WILDLIFE POLICY
In addition to these recently approved initiatives that I have outlined, the Ministry is in the process of developing an overarching management tool a National Wildlife Policy which went through the whole process of consultations and is now engaging attention of cabinet.

COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE FARMING
In addition the Ministry, will be collaborating with the Zoological Society of Trinidad and Tobago, the University of the West Indies and the Ministry of Food Production to undertake initiatives to develop model commercial wildlife farms and to provide capacity building support to encourage rural communities to establish wildlife farms in order to ensure that their livelihoods are not negatively impacted during the proposed two-year moratorium on hunting. The possibility of the provision of FINANCIAL support from the Green Fund to establish a wildlife farm is also be explored. We are well aware that even during the hunting season, wild meat is imported albeit illegally from nearby Guyana and Venezuela. A viable commercial wildlife farming initiative will therefore assist in the provision of wild meat products to satisfy the Trinbagonion palate. I am reminded that in the Red Brocket Deer is no longer part of the Tobago environment.

SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACT
Our Government is well aware of the potential socio economic impact of these measures on communities depending upon the hunting season to make a living. However with these new measures, those who previously made a living from killing will now be embraced by the Ministry and will be able to make a living from conserving.

CONCERNS OF HUNTERS
You would recall that I indicated the extent and depth and level of consultation. Whilst I hear the current hunting lobby “No Hunting, No Vote,” I want to indicate that we hear what they are saying but we must do the right thing. We are doing the right thing through the series of measures that I have outlined. Let me assure all citizens that these decisions are in the national interest and will certainly aid in the conservation our wildlife resources for future generations. We are protecting the wildlife for the future. We will not shirk from our responsibility; we will continue to do the right thing.

CONCLUSION
Members of the Media, Ladies and Gentlemen, Trinidad and Tobago has a long tradition of natural resource protection and conservation. In fact, the country established the western hemisphere’s first forest reserve for conservation, with the declaration of the Main Ridge Forest Reserve in 1765. This Government is committed to ensuring that the rich heritage of our natural environment is protected and sustainable used in a manner that will ensure that its integrity is passed on to future generations. One sure way of doing this will be through the implementation of this integrated approach to the management of our country’s most valuable natural resources.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the media, the task of wildlife protection is high on the agenda of the Government and the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources is committed to working with all stakeholders and interested parties to ensure that the measures implemented are in the best interest of the environment and our precious natural heritage…and I mean all stakeholders. In fact, I hope that the Confederation of Hunters and the South Eastern Hunters Association can embrace this new reality and be part of the preservation of the environment; we are willing to work with them. In the words of the Great Mahatma Gandhi, “What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another.”

I thank you
Written by C News                        
                  LINK TO ORIGINAL SOURCE     
                                                                                                              
















































Reprinted here for archival and news purposes only. 
Caiere Chase claims no rights to this story. 

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Hunters' Perspectives on the First Hound Hunt for Wolves


Theodore Roosevelt and General Custer did it. Now, over 100 years later, a handful of Wisconsin hunters can also claim they’ve successfully hunted wolves with dogs.
The controversial hunt — that’s still being challenged in the state’s court system — began on December 2.  Prior to that date, the wolf season was open, but not with the use of hounds.  The hunt ended on December 23 when Zone 3’s (northwest Wisconsin) quota of 71 wolves, of the state’s 251 total, was met.  Wisconsin has an over winter population estimate of 809 to 834 wolves and is the only state to allow the use of dogs when wolf hunting.

The Controversy
But some interest groups, anti-hunters, and even some active hunters, compare it to dog fighting. This is an uninformed opinion. Unlike in the recent Wisconsin hunt, breeds like the wolfhounds used in Roosevelt’s day often killed the wolves themselves.
But two of the hunters in the photo above, Jay and Jake, had a successful and safe hunt with their hounds this winter. These hunters used the same trailing hounds they hunt bears with. “Our biggest concern over having a bad encounter with a wolf isn’t during the December hunting season, it’s during the bear season, especially if we get near a rendezvous site,” said Jay. Rendezvous sites are locations where wolf pups are left for long periods of time while the adults are hunting. These sites are used from mid June until early fall until the pups are strong enough to keep up with the pack. 
“We’re not going to release our dogs on tracks of multiple wolves, we look for one animal. Single wolves aren’t as bold as packs of wolves will be. When we released our dogs, which are basically athletes doing what they’ve been bred to do, we expected them to bay up the wolf just like they do with the bear that doesn’t tree,” Jay continued. Baying up is a term used by hunters when an animal holds its ground as the dogs’ circle it. 
“We used Walker hounds. These aren’t fighting dogs, they’re family raised pets. The smaller dogs in the 40-50 pound range were the ones that caught and bayed up the wolves,” added Jake.  No more than 6 dogs can be used at one time when chasing a bear or a wolf, although these hunters used only 2 or 3.
Follow link below to read entire article.................>>>>>>>>>>>>
 Published: January 29, 2014
Story by: Dave Zeug
On: outdoorlife.com

Monday, 10 November 2014

EMA outpost for illegal quarrying




Environment Management Authority (EMA) chairman Dr Allan Bachan says it will open a post very soon in Valencia to address illegal quarrying. Bachan, addressing a joint select committee in Parliament on Friday, however, admitted he was still waiting for police to be assigned to assist the authority there. 
He told the JSC, which was chaired by Senator Elton Prescott, that the EMA had received approval for the re-assignment of officers to the post, but was still waiting for acting Commissioner Stephen Williams to assign them. The issue of quarrying was also raised at the EMA’s last appearance before the JSC in July. At that session Bachan said the EMA needed 100 more police officers, since most of the work it did was very sensitive and in some instances had led to death threats. 
At Friday’s hearing, Bachan, together with EMA director Phillip Vilain, technical director Hayden Romano and environmental manager David Persad, re-appeared before the JSC to address questions  about its policies and procedures.
He stressed that the issue of illegal quarrying and the protection of natural resources is a major concern for the authority. He said the EMA had been collaborating with other state agencies, including the Energy and Energy Affairs Ministry, to address quarrying and the environmental degradation of the Northern Range. Bachan did not say how many police officers the EMA had asked for.
Contacted by the T&T Guardian, Williams said the EMA had asked for support. “We have given the undertaking that we will provide Special Reserve Police (SRP) to assist with the policing aspect and before the end of the year they will receive some of the officers that they have requested,” Williams said.
Bachan: We have many challenges
The EMA chairman admitted the authority was challenged in many ways to effectively carry out its duties. He said apart from limited manpower, the very legislation it has to operate creates a challenge. In fact, Bachan said, the current legislation is “soft.” “When the EMA Act came into being it was intended to be soft legislation. So it is cheaper to pollute and break the law than to follow good practice. It is one of the issues we have recognised,” Bachan said.
He said the air pollution rules and water pollution rules were being revised to make them more relevant and strong. The EMA, he said, has no laboratory and this, he said, makes it difficult for the authority to address complaints about pollution. Companies seeking licences to pollute have to do their own tests for three years and provide the information to the EMA to be granted a licence to pollute.
“It is unacceptable to say someone is providing data on themselves. It should be the responsibility for us to assess the tests. The legislation has not worked for us to ensure the proper protection of the environment,” Bachan said. Small budgetary allocations, he said, also prevented the EMA from being effective. He said it often had to rent equipment to do tests because the money it was allocated was not enough to buy equipment.
Tourism Minister Gerald Hadeed raised the issue of the five dead sea turtles that were entangled in gill nets this week and asked why the EMA had not stopped the use of such nets, which have been banned around the world. But Dr Amery Browne said in all fairness to the EMA, banning gill nets in T&T must be a government policy decision and cannot be a decision taken by a regulatory authority.
Bachan announced that the EMA intended to establish an office in Tobago to deal with environmental complaints there. He also said it would soon launch an environmental hotline and an environmental channel.
Story by Reshma Ragoonath
Published: Monday, November 10, 2014                                                                                                     Article reproduced from www.guardian.co.tt/

Caiere Chase neither owns nor claims any rights to this news article.
Article reproduced here for archival purposes.

Tuesday, 28 October 2014

Singh: Hunting ban to stay in place


ENVIRONMENT Minister Ganga Singh has described as “alarming” the initial results of Government’s National Wildlife Survey, an exercise to determine game mammal stocks following the hunting ban which went into effect in 2013.

Singh, speaking at the launch yesterday of the second National Sea Turtle Symposium at Hilton Trinidad, said incoming results have indicated, through low game numbers, a lack of respect for wildlife reserves, where hunting was traditionally prohibited year round.

The survey, a component of the National Restoration, Carbon Sequestration, Wildlife and Livelihoods Project (NRCSWLP), is funded by the Green Fund and managed by the Environmental Management Authority (EMA).

Research and data collection is focused on five game mammals – lappe, deer, quenk, tattoo and agouti.

The University of the West Indies is responsible for the methodology of the project, which looked at Nariva, Trinity Hills, Southern Watershed, Central Range, Northern Range and Tobago.

A preliminary report, a combined effort between the UWI and the wildlife consultant on the project, has shown the alarming results, Singh said.

“Hunters have suggested that there are areas that were considered hunting sites and less hunted sites and suggested that areas not so identified should allow for a reference,” Singh said.

“The data analysis thus far shows no difference between the hunted sites and the reference sites. This may be indicating that hunting is ubiquitous and that there is no less hunted or ‘reference site’. That is to say all areas are hunted. The sanctuaries and reserves are being hunted; this tells us something about our society, our lack of enforcement and about our institutions that have responsibility for enforcement in the country.”

The preliminary figures indicate a decrease in wildlife species, Singh said, and as a result, the two-year moratorium on hunting will not be lifted.

The Minister said there were still many challenges in the enforcement of the ban, for which Government faced much backlash last year from the hunting community, including game hunters.

Singh said enforcement is key in ensuring the success of the ban and since the Wildlife Section of the Forestry Division does not have the capacity to handle enforcement on its own, Government will continue to collaborate with the Water and Sewerage Authority’s estate police, private security contractors, Petrotrin in the Southern areas, and the Chaguaramas Development Authority (CDA) officers for the Northern area.

“We are also introducing systemic change through the transition of the Forestry Division to a Forested and Protected Areas Management Authority that will be systemically different from a public sector department,” Singh said.

Story by: Kim Boodram

Friday, 24 October 2014

Hunters' Meeting 18/10/14 ???






Caiere Chase attended the hunters’ meeting held on Saturday 18th October 2014 at the Preysal Recreation Ground as per the public notice given in the Daily Express newspaper on Friday 17 October 2014.
It was never made clear at the meeting (while I was there) as to which Hunters Association was sponsoring this event, so on that point I am in the dark.
As far as I could tell there was only one official speaker. I believe this event was the action of an independent hunter but on this I might be wrong.
Let me make it quite clear that Caiere Chase is not affiliated with this group nor do we condone the planned actions discussed at the meeting. 

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

Hunting Banned For Two Years

Minister in the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources Ramona Ramdial said today the main purpose for the hunting ban was preservation.

By SUE-ANN-WAYOW sue-ann.wayow@trinidadexpress.com

Hunters, hang up your guns, and tie those dogs.

A two year moratorium on hunting was announced by the State
yesterday. The hunting season was due to open October 1.

Minister in the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources Ramona Ramdial said today the main purpose for the hunting ban was preservation.

During consultations regarding a wildlife policy that was implemented earlier this year, Ramdial said several persons called for the moratorium. She said the ministry was getting statistics from the University of the West Indies (UWI) and other organisations showing the degeneration of the wildlife population.

Ramdial said: " Therefore the moratorium on hunting would be to audit and assess what we have and then a way to move forward based on the statistics that we have."

She said a UWI professor would be partnering with the ministry to look at the possibility of breeding the wildlife population in captivity.
Ramdial said the main challenge for the government during the moratorium would be illegal hunting.

"The challenges however is the illegal hunting aspect.That is something that will need to be monitored and enforced with a partnership with the Ministry of the Environment and Forestry Division and National Security also."

And the ministry was attempting to address concerns that hunters would have.

Ramdial said: "An education and public awareness campaign is about to start and we have been laising with the hunters association.We are listening to them and we are going to find a way to deal with it (issues)."

Last month president of the Hunters’ Association of Trinidad and Tobago Buddie Miller said hunters will resist a moratorium if it was unfairly and unreasonably applied.

The last time a two-year moratorium was imposed was in 1987-89 and resulted in large sections of the forests in Biche, Charuma, Cumaca, Ecclesville and Moruga being overtaken by marijuana cultivators, said Miller.

A two-year moratorium which was imposed in 1987-89 and resulted in large sections of the forests in Biche, Charuma, Cumaca, Ecclesville and Moruga being overtaken by marijuana cultivators, said Miller. Mohan Bholasingh, President of the South Eastern Hunters' Association said he was against the ban " 150 per cent."

He said research showed that moratoriums were more destructive to wildlife than beneficial.
***
Article reproduced from www.trinidadexpress.com
Caiere Chase neither owns nor claims any rights to this news article.
This article has been reproduced here for archival purposes.

LINK TO FULL ARTICLE & WEBSITE